Posted: May 16, 2021
This page is categorized as:   link to Pandemic and Other Infectious Diseases index
Hover here for
Article SummaryCDC’s May 14 announcement that vaccinated people no longer need to wear masks or socially distance in most situations provoked a wide range of reactions, even among experts. Some exulted at the new freedom. Some thought it was long overdue and still insufficient. Some thought it was excessive and dangerous. Some worried that unvaccinated people would take advantage. Some worried that vaccinated people weren’t as safe as CDC was suddenly maintaining. Some worried that children and immunocompromised people were left in the lurch. Jody Lanard and I brainstormed our own reactions, and then converted our brainstorm into some notes on ways we thought CDC might have done a better messaging job. (A footnote for those who find this column either unduly skimpy or blessedly brief: We wrote it as a thread for Jody’s twitter feed @EIDGeek, then decided to post it virtually unchanged as a column.)

“We’re not all in this together anymore”:
CDC’s unspoken adultifying message
re masks and social distancing

CDC had multiple motives – some stated, some not – for its new mask and social distancing guidance for vaccinated people. Among them:

  • Responding to scientific evidence (only some of it new) that fully vaccinated people don’t usually need these precautions to protect themselves or others.
  • Trying to give unvaccinated people an additional incentive to get vaccinated.
  • Responding to widespread criticism that it was being overly cautious, losing the trust of those who shrugged off its advice and needlessly burdening those who followed it.

CDC’s messaging showcased the new evidence and explicitly disavowed the rest. CDC should have acknowledged the whole package.

What else would we have liked CDC to say?

Additional Thoughts on the New CDC Guidance

On May 20, Peter M. Sandman emailed Maggie Fox of CNN with some additional thoughts on the new CDC guidance saying vaccinated people could safely stop wearing masks and social distancing. The email is posted here.

The truth, of course. What follows is our sense of “the truth” about CDC’s mask and social distancing announcement. Most or all of it would ideally have been part of its messaging (and some of it was, sort of).

number 1

Before there were magnificently effective COVID-19 vaccines, “We’re all in this together” was a crucial pandemic message. The need to protect each other was at the heart of masks, social distancing, and other non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs).

number 2

Now, U.S. adults are divided into two cohorts: the vaccinated and the unvaccinated. The unvaccinated are a tiny threat to the vaccinated. The vaccinated are a tiny threat to the unvaccinated. The unvaccinated significantly threaten only each other. We’re not all in this together anymore.

number 3

This is the unspoken truth behind CDC’s announcement that vaccinated Americans no longer need to wear masks or maintain social distancing in most indoor spaces.

number 4

Unvaccinated American adults can respond to the announcement in any of three ways: (a) get vaccinated; (b) continue using NPIs in lieu of vaccination; or (c) stop using NPIs (if they were using them). Obviously, (c) is an undesirable effect and (a) is desirable. No one knows which one more unvaccinated people will choose.

number 5

The wonderful effect is on the vaccinated: freeing them from precautions that are no longer medically necessary. For a while, some vaccinated people will continue to wear masks and socially distance, for various reasons: caution, habit, mistrust, etc. Doctors Fauci and Walensky and White House administrator Slavitt all urged mutual tolerance between the masked and the unmasked.

number 6

In the absence of “vaccine passports,” it won’t be feasible for most third parties (stores, for example) to distinguish vaccinated from unvaccinated people, and thus to require NPIs of the latter but not the former. That may change if enough people want to be able to prove their vaccination status, but the new CDC recommendations don’t depend on the change.

number 7

That’s what makes the CDC announcement adultifying. Without vaccine passports, unvaccinated Americans are left in charge of their own and each other’s health. Vaccinated Americans have relatively little stake in what choice unvaccinated adults make, and should therefore avoid interfering or judging (out loud, anyway).

number 8

To reach this new set of recommendations, CDC needed to reach three conclusions:

  • That the residual threat unvaccinated Americans pose to vaccinated Americans is small enough to be acceptable.
  • That the amount of morbidity and mortality that will result when unvaccinated Americans (most of them young and healthy) are free to abandon NPIs without third-party policing will also be small enough to be acceptable. Widespread hospital overcrowding, for example, is not a likely outcome.
  • That given the first two points, continuing to recommend NPIs for all Americans would unduly penalize those who are vaccinated and unduly infantilize those who are unvaccinated.

number 9

Given variants, waning, and other sources of uncertainty, these three conclusions may not be true forever.

number 10

That’s why CDC continues to recommend NPIs for venues where vulnerability is highest and largely involuntary (prisons, hospitals, mass transit – maybe even some communities with high viral spread and low vaccine uptake). And CDC wisely reserves the right to change its recommendations as the situation changes.

number 11

There are real downsides to the new recommendations, especially for people who cannot choose to get vaccinated or are not fully protected by COVID-19 vaccines, specifically children and the immunocompromised. These groups will be less protected when other people, some of them unvaccinated, stop using NPIs. CDC made the difficult decision not to ask all Americans to continue using NPIs to protect children and the immunocompromised.

number 12

Parents should strongly support unvaccinated children in continuing to use NPIs in crowded indoor venues.

number 13

We are not out of the pandemic woods. But we are in a clearing. Those of us who are vaccinated are in a very safe part of the clearing. And those of us who are unvaccinated have a well-marked path to that very safe part of the clearing, if and when they choose to take it.

We wish CDC had said all this more explicitly. We especially wish it had told unvaccinated Americans:

We hope you will get vaccinated. If you don’t, we hope you will wear masks and socially distance. If you don’t do that either, we hope you will stay well anyway, and we will do our best to care for you if you get sick. Except in locations and businesses that keep mask policies in place, and certain high-risk settings, the decision is yours. Unless vaccine passports become viable, nobody will be policing it.

Public health is often paternalistic. It tries to protect people more than they want to be protected. Sometimes there is no other option, because one person’s unwise decisions endanger other people’s health. Thanks to the amazing COVID-19 vaccines, this time there is an option, and CDC picked it: treating the public like adults, and honoring the right to be unwise. The alternative to informed consent is informed refusal.

We favor a full range of efforts to increase COVID-19 vaccine uptake: incentives; outreach that responds better to people’s concerns; improved access; an easy way to prove vaccine status, so employers and venues can require vaccination (or require either vaccination or NPIs). We favor pretty much anything to increase vaccine uptake except governments making people get vaccinated … or making vaccinated people continue to use NPIs they no longer need.

Copyright © 2021 by Peter M. Sandman and Jody Lanard


For more on infectious diseases risk communication:    link to Pandemic and Other Infectious Diseases index
      Comment or Ask      Read the comments
Contact information page:    Peter M. Sandman

Website design and management provided by SnowTao Editing Services.