 |
1. Byrne A. Mobile phones redesigned after cancer fears. Sydney Morning Herald, 1995; July 12:8. |
|
2. Potter B. Australia most upwardly mobile:Optus. The Age 1996; Feb 20:A-5. |
|
3. Chapman S, Lupton D. The fight for public health. Principles and practice of media advocacy. London:British Medical Journal Books, 1994. |
|
4. Fairclough N. Discourse and text: linguistic and intertextual analysis within discourse analysis. Discourse and Society, 1992; 3:193-217. |
|
5. Anderson V, Joyner KH. Specific absorption rate levels measured in a phantom head exposed to radio frequency transmissions from analog hand-held mobile phones. Bioelectromagnetics, 1995;16:60-9. |
|
6. Clifford KJ, Joyner KH, Stroud DB, Wood M, Ward B, Fernandez CH. Mobile telephones interfere with medical electrical equipment. Aust Phys Engin Sci Med, 1994;17:23-7. |
|
7. Fleming AH, Joyner KH. Estimates of absorption of radiofrequency radiation by the embryo and fetus during pregnancy. Health Phys, 1992;63:149-59. |
|
8. Garson OM, McRobert TL, Campbell LJ, Hocking BA, Gordon IA. Chromosomal study of workers with long-term exposure to radio-frequency radiation. Med J Aust, 1991; 155:289-92. |
|
9. Bernhardt JH. Non-ionizing radiation safety: radiofrequency radiation, electric and magnetic fields. Phys Med Biol, 1992;37:807-44. |
|
10. Goldoni J, Durek M, Koren Z. Health status of personnel occupationally exposed to radiowaves. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol, 1993;44:223-8. |
|
11. World Health Organisation. Electromagnetic fields (300 Hz to 300 GHz). Environmental Health Criteria 137. Geneva:WHO, 1993. |
|
12. Michaelson SM. Biological effects of radiofrequency radiation: concepts and criteria. Health Phys, 1991;61:3-14. |
|
13. Horn Y. The potential carcinogenic hazards of electromagnetic radiation: a review. Cancer Detect Prev, 1995;19:244-9. |
|
14. Bangay M. Radiated emission levels from Telstra mobile base station, Harbord, NSW. Australian Radiation Laboratory, 15 August 1995. |
|
15. Covello VT. Informing people about risks from chemicals, radiation, and other toxic substances: a review of obstacles to public understanding and effective risk communication. in:Leiss, W. (ed.) Prospects and problems in risk communication. Waterloo: University of Waterloo Press, 1989:1-49. |
|
16. Guidotti TL. Comparing environmental risks: A consultative approach to setting priorities at the community level. Public Health Rev, 1994; 22:321-37. |
|
17. Sandman PM. Responding to community outrage: strategies for effective risk communication. Fairfax, Va.:American Industrial Hygiene Association, 1995. |
|
18. Sandman PM. Hazard versus outrage in the public perception of risk. in: Covello, V.T., McCallum, D.B., Pavlova, M.T. (eds.) Effective risk communication. New York:Plenum Press, 1989:45-9. |
|
19. Sandman PM. "Risk = Hazard + Outrage. A formula for effective risk communication" (video). Fairfax, Va.:American Industrial Hygiene Association 1989. |
|
20. Covello VT, Von Winterfeldt D, Slovic P. Communicating scientific information about health and environmental risks: problems and opportunities from a social and behavioural perspective. In: Covello, V., Lave, L., Maghissi, A., Uppuluri, V.R.R. (eds.) Uncertainties in risk assessment and management. New York:Plenum, 1986. |
|
21. van Dijk TA. (ed.) Discourse and Communication - New Approaches to the Analysis of Mass Media Discourse and Communication. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter, 1985. |
|
22. Corner S. Building a new national code. Australian Communications, 1995-96, December/January:15-6. |
|
23. Beck U. Risk society. Towards a new modernity. London:Sage, 1994. |
|
24. Douglas M. The meaning of myth. In: Leach,E. (ed.) The structural study of myth and totemism. London:Tavistock, 1968. |
|
25. Levi-Strauss C. The raw and the cooked. New York:Harper and Row, 1969. |
|
26. Chapman S. Unravelling gossamer with boxing gloves: problems in explaining the decline in smoking. BMJ 1993;307:429-32. |
Part 1: Abstract 
Part 3: Appendix 1: Bibliography
