Peter Sandman Website logo

divider bar

Introduction and Index

Risk Communication, Risk Statistics,
and Risk Comparisons:
A Manual for Plant Managers

by Vincent T. Covello, Peter M. Sandman, and Paul Slovic

(Washington, DC: Chemical Manufacturers Association, 1988), p. 1

divider bar

 

Introduction

The Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (Title III of Superfund) and many state and local laws are imposing much more openness on the chemical industry. During the next few years, plant managers will increasingly be called upon to provide and explain information about chemical risks to employees, customers, and communities near chemical plants.

Plant managers can use this manual for practical guidance on providing and explaining information about chemical risks. A basic assumption of the manual is that risk communication, when done properly, is always better than stonewalling. In the long run, more effective risk communication will be better for plant managers, communities, and the chemical industry as a whole.

The manual consists of five substantive parts: (I) effectively communicating risk information; (II) guidelines for providing and explaining risk-related numbers and statistics; (III) guidelines for providing and explaining risk comparisons; (IV) concrete examples of risk comparisons; and (V) anticipating objections to explanations of chemical risks. The manual also includes a set of appendices containing tables of risk statistics and warning notes about the usefulness and reliability of the statistics.

Although this manual will not try to cover all aspects of risk communication, neither will it be confined to such narrow topics as risk comparisons. To be useful, the manual must also address closely related topics, such as how best to explain information on emission levels and concentrations of chemicals in air and water. A short bibliography is provided at the end of the manual for those interested in pursuing these topics in greater depth.

Most of the material in the manual focuses on providing and explaining data on health risks, especially long-term data. The emphasis is not on providing and explaining information about the risks of accidents. In some cases, accidents raise similar communication issues — especially when most of the expected adverse health effects are long-term rather than acute. However, in dealing with risks of accidents, it is generally both more relevant and more reliable to focus on preventive measures, emergency response procedures, containment and remediation procedures, and the extent of the possible damage.

divider bar

Index

Introduction and Index

Next SectionI . Effectively Communicating Risk Information

Next SectionII. Guidelines for Presenting and Explaining Risk-Related Numbers and Statistics

Next SectionIII. Guidelines for Providing and Explaining Risk Comparisons

Next SectionIV. Concrete Examples of Risk Comparisons

Next SectionV. Anticipating Objections to Explanations of Chemical Risks

Next SectionConclusion

Acknowledgements

Next SectionAppendix A: Concentration and Quantity Comparisons

Next SectionAppendix B: Risk Comparison Tables And Figures

Next SectionAppendix C: Risk Perception Factors

Next SectionSelected Bibiliography on Risk Communication

 

Back to articles list

blue-bar.jpg - 2595 Bytes

Comment or Ask       Read the comments

Peter M. Sandman
59 Ridgeview Rd.
Princeton NJ 08540-7601
Phone: 1-609-683-4073
Fax: 1-609-683-0566
Email: peter@psandman.com
home link

Website design and management provided by SnowTao Editing Services.
bar